2016 Mitsubishi Lancer DE 0-60 Times, Top Speed, Specs, Quarter Mile, and Wallpapers

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer  DE  0-60 Times, Top Speed, Specs, Quarter Mile, and Wallpapers

The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer DE is a Front-wheel drive Sedan. It can accommodate up to 5 passengers. It has 4 Doors and is powered by a 2.0L L4 DOHC 16-valve engine which outputs 148 hp @ 6000 rpm and is paired with 5-speed manual transmission gearbox. The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer DE has cargo capacity of 376 Liters and the vehicle weighs 1305 kg. In terms of ride assists, the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer DE has stability control and traction control in addition to anti-lock brake system (ABS). The vehicle has an optional engine as well It offers and. Safety features also include Driver-side front airbag and Passenger-side front airbag. The front suspension is Front independent suspension while the rear suspension is Rear independent suspension. The car also features a Yes It has 16-inch steel wheels with covers as standard. Electronic features include Cruise Control. For convenience, the car has Power windows and Power door locks. There is also a remote keyless entry feature. Moreover, the car has. The steering wheel has audio control buttons. In terms of performance, the car has 161 N.m of torque and a top speed of 194 km/h. The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer DE accelerates from zero to 60 mph in 9.4 seconds and hits quarter mile at 16.9 seconds. Fuel consumption is 9.6 L/100km in the city and 7 L/100km in the highway. The car price starts at $ 14,998

Name DE
Price $ 14,998
Body Sedan
Doors 4 Doors
Engine 2.0L L4 DOHC 16-valve
Power 148 hp @ 6000 rpm
Number of Seats 5 Seats
Transmission 5-speed manual transmission
Cargo Space 376.0 L
Maximum Cargo Space 376.0 L
Wheel Type 16-inch steel wheels with covers
Series Lancer X (facelift 2016)
Drivetrain Front-wheel drive
Horsepower 148 HP
Torque 161 N.m
Top Speed 194 km/h
Acceleration 0-100 km/h (0-60 mph) 9.4 s
Fuel Type Petrol (Gasoline)
Fuel Consumption (City) 9.6 L/100km
Fuel Consumption (Highway) 7.0 L/100km
Gear Type auto
Weight 1,335 KG
Brand Mitsubishi
Model Lancer
0-400m (Quarter Mile) 16.9 s
0-400m (Quarter Mile) - Speed 136.5 km/h
0-800m (Half Mile) 28.0 s
0-800m (Half Mile) - Speed 153.6 km/h
Modifications (MODS)
Modifications Cost $ 0

2016 MITSUBISHI Lancer 1.6 EX 0-100 in 10 Sec.

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer GT specs acceleration

Mitsubishi Lancer CK4 PKM Ft ORD Exhaust at Sentul Drag Race 27-28 Agustus 2016

Frist Drive 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Top Speed

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Used Price Estimates

Estimates based on a driving average of 12,000 miles per year
Used Condition Trade In Price Private Party Price Dealer Retail Price
Outstanding $ 7,442 $ 9,350 $ 11,358
Clean $ 7,160 $ 9,002 $ 10,911
Average $ 6,597 $ 8,306 $ 10,017
Rough $ 6,033 $ 7,610 $ 9,123

The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer is one of a few options in the compact car segment that provides all-wheel drive as an option. If you live in an area with a lot of wet weather or snow, that's a definite bonus. Read more to find out what else the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer has to offer.

In an attempt to make the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer more attractive in a highly competitive segment, the Japanese automaker has added fresh front-end styling, an overhauled CVT and a host of new standard features. Trouble is, this Mitsubishi has been in production for a full decade without a redesign, and it shows. Fuel economy with the base 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine trails class leaders by a wide margin, while the optional 2.4-liter four is as thirsty as some modern V6s. The Lancer also struggles with basic refinement and ergonomic issues, such as coarse noises from the 2.0-liter engine, mediocre interior materials and a tilt-only steering wheel.

The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer's advanced age works against it in this hotly contested class.

The Lancer does retain the advantage of available all-wheel drive, an unusual offering that makes it more attractive to buyers in snowy climes. But if it's AWD you're after, the 2016 Subaru Impreza is a better bet. And if you're cool with front-wheel drive, there are many excellent alternatives, including the superb new 2016 Honda Civic, the sleek and fuel-efficient 2016 Mazda 3 and the recently updated 2016 Ford Focus. Ultimately, the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer may offer appealing features at an attractive price, but it's not close to the head of this class.

The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer is a small sedan available in four trim levels: ES, SE, SEL and GT.

The entry-level ES comes with the 2.0-liter engine, 16-inch alloy wheels, foglights, LED running lights, heated mirrors with integrated turn signals, remote keyless entry, automatic climate control, a height-adjustable driver seat, 60/40-split folding rear seatbacks, a tilt-only steering wheel, full power accessories, cruise control, a color driver information screen, Bluetooth, Fuse voice controls and a four-speaker sound system with a CD player and a USB port.

Although the 2016 Lancer's basic control layout stretches back a full decade, you can still enjoy a number of contemporary features.

The SE adds two-tone alloy wheels, keyless entry and ignition, heated front seats, a rearview camera, a 6.1-inch touchscreen interface and a six-speaker sound system with satellite radio and HD radio.

Step up to the SEL trim level and you get automatic headlights, automatic wipers, an auto-dimming rearview mirror, upgraded interior trim, leather upholstery and a leather-wrapped steering wheel and shift knob.

The GT throws in 18-inch two-tone alloy wheels, a sport-tuned suspension, a sunroof, a rear spoiler, heated front seats, soft-touch trim on the front doors and a nine-speaker Rockford Fosgate audio system with a subwoofer.

A Sun & Sound package is offered solely on the ES and includes the sunroof, touchscreen display, rearview camera and Rockford Fosgate audio system with satellite and HD radio. Optional on every Lancer trim is a Navigation System package that includes a 7-inch touchscreen. Accessory options include LED foglights and rear parking sensors.

The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer ES is powered by a 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine that produces 148 horsepower and 145 pound-feet of torque. A five-speed manual transmission is standard, while a CVT is optional. EPA-estimated fuel economy stands at 30 mpg combined (27 city/35 highway) with the CVT and 28 mpg combined (24/34) with the manual.

The rest of the Lancer lineup is powered by a 2.4-liter four-cylinder (optional on the ES) that makes 168 hp and 167 lb-ft of torque. The SE and SEL come standard with the CVT and all-wheel drive, and the ES also gets the CVT/AWD pairing when optioned with the larger engine. This powertrain achieves an EPA-estimated 26 mpg combined (23 city/31 highway).

The GT gets a five-speed manual gearbox and front-wheel drive as standard, while its optional CVT is paired with front-wheel drive and features a Manual mode with simulated gear ratios and shift paddles. The manual GT checks in at 25 mpg combined (22/31) with the manual and 27 mpg combined (24/31) with the CVT.

Standard safety features on all 2016 Mitsubishi Lancers include front seat side airbags, full-length side curtain airbags and a driver knee airbag. Stability control, traction control and antilock brakes are standard across the board. After years of reserving four-wheel disc brakes for higher trim levels, Mitsubishi has thankfully made them standard for 2016. A rearview camera is standard on all Lancers except the ES. Rear parking sensors are sold as an accessory on all trim levels.

In government crash tests, the Lancer received four out of five stars for overall crashworthiness, including four stars for frontal protection and four stars for side protection. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety awarded the Lancer its top score of "Good" in moderate-overlap frontal-offset, side-impact and roof-strength crash tests. In the small-overlap frontal-offset test, the Lancer earned the second highest "Acceptable" rating. Its seat/head restraint design was rated "Good" for whiplash protection in rear impacts.

On the road, the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer's standard 2.0-liter engine disappoints with its unrefined noises under hard acceleration. Opting for the 2.4-liter four-cylinder improves refinement and increases the fun quotient, especially when paired with the GT's standard five-speed manual transmission. Fuel economy plummets, however. The 2.4-liter Lancer is at the back of the pack in this regard.

The 2016 Lancer is more enjoyable if you get the 2.4-liter engine, but you won't love the fuel economy that comes with it.

The Lancer's suspension delivers confident handling and a decent ride quality. Buyers looking for improved driving dynamics will find the GT model's sport-tuned suspension to be more rewarding, though the larger wheels and tires generate more noise on certain types of pavement.

Inside, the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer has a look that's rather plain, with gauges and controls laid out in a manner that emphasizes function over form. While there's nothing wrong with that, it bears noting that the abundance of hard plastics cheapens the overall effect. Mitsubishi's voice-activation system, dubbed Fuse, makes it possible to control the audio and navigation systems, but it lacks the flexibility of competing systems. Likewise, while the 6.1-inch center touchscreen operates intuitively, its graphics fall short of the standard set by rival sedans.

The Navigation System package brings this larger 7-inch touchscreen, but its graphics and interface are dated.

Up front, seat comfort is generally good, though tall drivers will likely wish for more thigh support and a telescoping steering wheel. The backseats are surprisingly spacious, with a goodly amount of legroom. The trunk is on the small side, however, with just 12.3 cubic feet of cargo capacity, a number that drops to 11.8 cubic feet with the Rockford Fosgate audio system's subwoofer installed. The 60/40-split rear seatbacks fold down, however, for added cargo-carrying flexibility.

The driving dynamics of the Mitsubishi Lancer deserve mention, because this compact 4-door rides, drives and handles better than the expectations of its segment require. With only 148 horsepower the base 2.0-liter engine is a little pokey, but the 168-horsepower 2.4-liter is just fine for the Lancer’s nimble mass. While not a sports car, it’s a kind of sporty compact; the ride deals with irregularities, it’s stable and predictable and it turns into mountain curves or those favorite onramps with responsive precision. Interior noise levels are maybe a little high for the class, but not so much that you can’t pick up the tunes or talk being cranked out by the audio system. The ES 2.4, SE 2.4 and SEL 2.4 models include electronically controlled all-wheel drive, which Mitsubishi calls All-Wheel Control, for exemplary traction no matter what the weather brings.

ROCKFORD FOSGATE SOUND SYSTEMThose looking for the best in-car audio in a compact sedan will be impressed by the 2016 Lancer’s 9-speaker, 710-watt Rockford Fosgate audio system; it’s standard on the GT 2.4 and optional, as part of the Sun and Sound Package, on the ES 2.0 with CVT. It has our recommendation.ALL-WHEEL CONTROLMitsubishi calls the Lancer’s electronically controlled all-wheel-drive system All-Wheel Control. It includes a mode selector for front-wheel drive, all-wheel drive "Auto" or all-wheel-drive "Lock," to maintain optimum traction in all kinds of weather or driving conditions. It’s standard on the 2.4 ES, 2.4 SE and 2.4 SEL trim levels.

Stylistically, the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer’s interior could be from any number of compact 4-door sedans. An instrument-panel pod in front of the driver includes the major gauges; low in the center are knobs for the climate controls and above that is a spot for the display screen, which is easily visible but almost looks added-on between the air conditioning vents. All the necessities are present; it’s just not going to knock you out. There is also no telescoping adjustment for the steering wheel. The rear seatbacks fold down for carrying long items.

There’s a slightly sporty stance to the 2016 Lancer, with its nose-down, tail-up rake and tidy shape, and this is accentuated with the GT and its 18-inch wheels and standard rear spoiler. Beyond that, it’s cleanly and nicely done but not memorable. Headlights and grille opening are neatly integrated into the wraparound front fascia, a rising character line along the side emphasizes the rake, and at the rear the taillights kind of mimic the look of the headlights as they curve into the trunklid.

As part of its value message the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer is well equipped. Standard on the ES 2.0 model are fog lights, power and heated mirrors, 16-inch alloy wheels, automatic climate control, 140-watt AM/FM/CD/MP3 audio, Bluetooth, steering-wheel-mounted audio and cruise controls, power windows and door locks and a comprehensive array of safety features. The three middle trim levels, ES 2.4, SE 2.4 and SEL 2.4, all have the 2.4-liter engine, continuously variable transmission and All-Wheel Control electronically controlled all-wheel drive. Moving up through the trims adds automatic on/off headlights, rain-sensing wipers, more audio system speakers, leather and other convenience items.

Generally, the 2016 Lancer’s options are wrapped into the trim levels and packages. A nice option (which we recommend) is the 710-watt Rockford Fosgate audio system but, strangely, it’s available only on the 2.0 ES model as an option (as part of the Sun and Sound Package, which includes power sunroof, rearview camera and other features) and the GT 2.4 as standard. There is also a Navigation System Package, All Weather Package, Chrome Package, Popular Equipment Package, LED Illumination Package and an assortment of trim and convenience accessories.

The base Lancer ES 2.0 has a 2.0-liter 4-cylinder of 148 horsepower and 145 lb-ft of torque, with either a 5-speed manual or continuously variable transmission (CVT). All the upgrade trim levels include the 2.4-liter 4-cylinder of 168 horsepower and 167 lb-ft of torque; it’s available with the 5-speed manual in the GT 2.4 model, or with the CVT as standard in the ES 2.4, SE 2.4 and SEL 2.4 and optional in the GT 2.4. The ES 2.0 and GT 2.4 are front-drive, while the other three models have All-Wheel Control all-wheel drive. For the combination of the larger engine, upgraded features, reasonable price and the inclusion of the all-wheel-drive system, we recommend one of the middle trim levels.2.0-liter inline-4 (ES)148 horsepower @ 6,000 rpm; 143 horsepower @ 6,000 rpm (California)145 lb-ft of torque @ 4,200 rpm; 143 lb-ft of torque @ 4,200 rpm (California)EPA city/highway fuel economy: 24/34 mpg (manual), 27/35 mpg (automatic)2.4-liter inline-4 (SE, GT)168 horsepower @ 6,000 rpm167 lb-ft of torque @ 4,100 rpmEPA city/highway fuel economy: 22/31 mpg (manual), 23/31 mpg (automatic, AWD), 24/31 mpg (GT 2.4, automatic)

The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer has a Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) around $ 18,500 for an ES 2.0 model with the 5-speed manual transmission. A fully loaded GT 2.4 will be around $ 29,000. For the features and value for the money, we recommend one of the middle trim levels, which also include the all-weather security of the electronically controlled all-wheel drive, and don’t forget the great warranty. Various Lancer models compete with a wide assortment of alternatives: Honda Civic and Accord, Toyota Corolla and Camry, Chevrolet Cruze and Malibu, Ford Focus and Fusion. Before going to the dealer, be sure and check the Fair Purchase Price to see what others in your area are paying for a 2016 Lancer. We expect residual values for the Mitsubishi Lancer to be in line with most of the competitors, but below those of historical leaders such as the Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla.

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer DE Exterior Colors

Alloy silver
Diamond White
Rally red
Tarmac black
Titanium grey
Octane blue
Ocean Blue

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer DE Interior Colors

Black

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Engines

Engine Standard in Trim Power Torque Fuel Consumption - City Fuel Consumption - Highway 0-100 km/h Quarter Mile Half Mile
2.4L L4 DOHC 16-valve GTS 168 hp @ 6000 rpm 161 N.m 9.9 L/100km 6.9 L/100km 8.5 s 16.2 s 26.8 s
2.4L L4 DOHC 16-valve SE AWC LTD 168 hp @ 6000 rpm 161 N.m 8.7 L/100km 6.9 L/100km 8.0 s 14.3 s 26.8 s
2.4L L4 DOHC 16-valve SE Black Edition AWC 168 hp @ 6000 rpm 161 N.m 10.2 L/100km 6.9 L/100km 8.0 s 14.3 s 26.8 s
2.4L L4 DOHC 16-valve GTS AWC 168 hp @ 6000 rpm 161 N.m 8.7 L/100km 7.9 L/100km 8.0 s 14.3 s 26.8 s
2.4L L4 DOHC 16-valve GTS 168 hp @ 6000 rpm 161 N.m 10.5 L/100km 7.7 L/100km 8.5 s 16.2 s 26.8 s
2.4L L4 DOHC 16-valve SE AWC Limited Edition 168 hp @ 6000 rpm 161 N.m 9.8 L/100km 7.6 L/100km 8.0 s 14.3 s 26.8 s
2.4L L4 DOHC 16-valve GTS AWC 168 hp @ 6000 rpm 161 N.m 9.8 L/100km 7.7 L/100km 8.0 s 14.3 s 26.8 s
2.0L L4 DOHC 16-valve DE 148 hp @ 6000 rpm 161 N.m 9.6 L/100km 6.9 L/100km 9.0 s 16.5 s 27.4 s
2.0L L4 DOHC 16-valve GT 148 hp @ 6000 rpm 161 N.m 9.2 L/100km 6.9 L/100km 9.0 s 16.5 s 27.4 s
2.0L L4 turbo DOHC 16-valve GSR 291 hp @ 6500 rpm 161 N.m 14.0 L/100km 10.3 L/100km 5.1 s 11.7 s 21.9 s

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Trims

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Previous Generations

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Future Generations

Mitsubishi Lancer Overview and History

The new Lancer 2017 is a compact sedan, available with two engine variants: a four-cylinder 2.0-liter engine with a power output of 148 hp, and a 2.4-liter engine with a power output of 168 hp. All-wheel drive is standard on the larger unit as is a CVT transmission, the base model gets a 5-speed manual transmission (the auto is optional) and front-wheel drive. Neither setup is particularly refined or potent but fuel economy is acceptable.
Part of the Mitsubishi business conglomerate, Mitsubishi Motors has earned its place on the Japanese and international car market. The company's history starts sometime in 1917, when the first Mitsubishi model, a seven-seater sedan based on the Fiat Tipo 3, rolls off the assembly line. Not very successful, production was discontinued after just 22 models were built.

True production begins after the merger of Mitsubishi Shipbuilding and Mitsubishi Aircraft Co. in 1934. Concentrated on building aircraft, ships, and railroad cars, the company found time to make a prototype sedan in 1937 which it called the PX33. Sadly, it was mainly for military use as the war approached.

Only after the war did the company really got into car production with a small three-vehicle vehicle, the Mizushima and a scooter with a funny name, the Silver Pigeon. Then came the split of the former conglomerate, because the conquering Allies did not see with favorable eyes Japan's industrial development.

A decade later, things in Japan were looking up and personal transportation became an issue again as more and more families afforded cars. Enter the Mitsubishi 500, a sedan for the masses, and later the Minica small car and the Colt 1000 in 1963. With sales rising, the remnants of the Mitsubishi conglomerate were united once again in 1970.

The next step for the company was to ally itself with a foreign company, Chrysler in this case, which bought 15% of the Mitsubishi, which afforded the Japanese manufacturer the license to sell rebadged Galants as Dodge Colts in the States and as Chrysler Scorpions in Australia.

In this way, Mitsubishi was able to raise numbers in production and set up a series of dealerships around Europe. But if for Mitsubishi things were looking up, the same could not be said about its American partner which was forced to sell the Australian manufacturing division in 1980.

Two years later, Mitsubishi would enter the American market under its own name with the Tredia sedan, the Cordia and the Starion coupe. The car quota was established at 30,000 vehicles but the Japanese were keen to increase that number and they began a campaign of active advertising. By the end of the 80s, Mitsubishi had achieved 1,5 million units produced worldwide.

In order to bypass the strict import regulations and to ease the tensions between the two companies, Mitsubishi and Chrysler founded a new vehicle manufacturing company in Normal, Illinois under the name Diamond-Star Motors which started production in 1987. The models that came out of this plant include the Mitsubishi Eagle, the Eagle Talon and the Plymouth Laser.

In 1988 the company changed its status from being privately owned to public. Mitsubishi industries remained the largest stockholder with 25% of the company, while Chrysler upped its share to 20 %. Later, in 1992, it reduced the equity to just 3% and even sold its interest in Diamond-Star Motors, leaving Mitsubishi as the sole owner.

In 1995, Mitsubishi Motors changed its name to the current on from DSM as it was previously known on the American market. Also, it opened up a new North American Manufacturing Division in 2002.

In 2000, Mitsubishi sought a new partnership with the newly formed Daimler-Chrysler concern which cost the German-American group $ 1.9 billion, $ 200 million less than the original price once the defect cover-up scandal came out. It seems that Mitsubishi had systematically covered up defects in its production cars as far back as 1977, involving anything from failing brakes to faulty clutch systems. When the news was disclosed, the company was forced to recall 163,707 vehicles for free repairs.

That, coupled with a economic crisis in the Asian region caused Mitsubishi a loss in profit and even  the need to downsize in order to cope with falling demand. A new breed of cars, revitalized models and forward thinking was what brought Mitsubishi back on track. The Mitsubishi i, a small car perfect for the Asian market and the new Lancer and Outlander were enough to put the company back on the market. This lead to the first profitable quarter at Mitsubishi in four year to be declared in 2006.

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Consumer Reviews

sunnycomma, 04/05/2017
ES 4dr Sedan (2.0L 4cyl CVT)
Between the Corolla and the Camry...Perfect
This is our 3rd Lancer in the family and not the last. 26 mpg on mountain roads and the 2.0 ltr has power to spare as peepy as my wifes AWC 2.4 ltr Lancer. I don't like the new front bumper design but can live with that. Paint with Mitsubishi has always been an issue so you must stay on top of the waxing. If you step up and pay a little more from the 5spd stick you get lots of extras. I really liked my wifes 2015 but I love my 2016. We will drive these for 10 yrs and then pass them to the grandkids. Keep the oil changed and the servicing up to date and these will go the distance not to mention they have timing chains not belts which have to changed out and thats not cheap. We paid $ 15500 which included destination (which is a bs charge but they won't waive it) plus tax and lic.
mercifultuesday, 07/02/2017
ES 4dr Sedan AWD (2.4L 4cyl CVT)
Great Car- Easily Overlooked
Lets be real about this review. This is a compact AWD car for around $ 20k. It is more of an entry level AWD car. But I think it is an all-around, excellent, fun to drive car. For what you pay and what you get it is an outstanding value. This car is easily overlooked in favor of other small foreign cars. So far no mechanical issues (63,000 miles and was purchased brand new). I have a 2016 ES, AWD with the 2.4 CVT. I love the (lack of) technology in the car. It's simple and in some ways , "old school". Controls are laid out well and easy to use. Visibility is excellent!! I never have any issues checking my blind spots or backing the car. Engine: I have the optional 2.4 engine but this comes standard with the AWD system. Mine is crippled by the CVT transmission. This engine delivers very nice power (relatively speaking) especially at highway speeds. It was quite peppy and responsive when new but it seems to have quickly lost some of its punch. Off the line acceleration is not bad from 0-30 mph; but from 30-60mph, tends to drop off a bit. I can manage a 0-60 time of about 8 seconds. It was slightly quicker when new and may have dropped into the mid-7's from time to time. This is not a race car and you will not win any drag races with it. However, the engine is adequate for "normal" driving under most conditions. Fuel Economy: I personally find the fuel-economy to be very good. If you put things into perspective and consider the following; 2.4, CVT (automatic) with A/C and AWD. Then I think 30 MPG is outstanding!! If you can manage to drive around the speed limit on the highway I have even managed an occasional 32 MPG from time to time. I don't know why other reviews on this car suggest fuel-economy is sub-par. Transmission: I don't care for the CVT automatic ( but to be fair, it has not given me any issues yet). I think it holds the engine performance back too much and it never allows the engine to happily-rev to the red line, instead it allows for a leisurely stroll around the tach. Also, the engine tends to operate in the same range of about 1500-2500 rpm for almost every driving condition. I find myself forcing higher rpm from the engine, just to get it out of that operating range from time to time. So I find this to be pretty disappointing. For lack of better wording, I also find the engine trying to "lug" from time to time, especially if climbing a grade at highway speed. This is among the worst CVT transmissions I have ever used. It is far from smooth and VERY slow to respond to throttle changes. Mine does tend to "jerk" from time to time, and has no problems letting you know it's unrefined. For the AWD system: This car is AWD, ...NOT... 4wheel Drive. Yes, there is a difference! During my snow testing of the car I used the "4wheel Lock" feature and de-activated the traction control system. I feel this allowed the AWD system to have as much power as possible for the tests I performed with the car. Other settings are available and many of you may prefer to leave the traction control system on during snow driving conditions. I finally had the opportunity to drive the car in some snow conditions. (keep in mind that tires play a significant role in this area). My tires are 205-60-16 and in my opinion much too large for this vehicle. A tall narrow tire goes best in snow conditions. Short, wide tires are useless on snow and ice covered roads. I have replaced the original Yokohama tires with Continentials (and the Continential tires performed much worse than the OE-Yokohama's). Most of the snow I drove in was approx 4"-6" as we simply don't get the amount of snow we used to in my area. I found the car to spin quite a bit, in anything more than 4" especially when getting started from a stop and even easing on the throttle. (but... I did deliberately stop on a snow covered grade a couple of times in an attempt to get the car stuck, but with some wheel spin and good use of the throttle I was on my way) I did have the opportunity to drive the car in some deeper snow (say between 6"-8") on a couple of secondary roads during the past winter. The car performed well but there is room for improvement. Again, I did notice a bit of wheel spin from the rear wheels under the worst conditions. This is more than I would like for an AWD car. It slips and spins, especially in deeper snow but it did NOT get stuck. It seems capable and got the job done. I'm not sure I would take this car off road, and the owners manual does not recommend it either. So better stick to roads on the map, just to be safe. Overall: I'm very pleased with the car. I purchased mine brand new and so far no serious problems. It fits my budget, seems reliable and meets my needs. I am heart-broken to find that Mitsubishi no longer offers the car in it's lineup.
immatureminds, 09/20/2016
ES 4dr Sedan (2.0L 4cyl 5M)
I love my lancer!
This is the third Mitsubishi I have owned and it has been great, and the dealership I bought it from was also excellent. I got it for $ 14,000 brand new, have had no issues like all of my other mitsu's. Its disparaging see such poor reviews on vehicles like this that are clearly superior to thier american counterparts, like the dart, cruise or focus, that all blow up or the infotatinment system needs to constantly be messed with, or push button start going out at 20,000 miles or trannies going out @ 50,000 miles. Enjoy your fords that will rust out in ten months [non-permissible content removed].
yieldpseudo, 09/12/2016
SEL 4dr Sedan AWD (2.4L 4cyl CVT)
Big Mistake
I was excited to purchase the Lancer because it offered a sporty styling with AWC at a reasonable price. After owning a 2016 Lancer SEL for a little over a month I hate the car. Driver ergonomics are deplorable: - Leather seats that are uncomfortable (I feel like I've been sitting on a metal folding chair after a 20-30 minute drive. Lower back support and seating side support is almost non-existent. - A dead pedal foot rest gives no room to stretch out my left leg. The only way to extend my left leg is to put my foot under the brake pedal - not a safe thing to do - or keep my leg bent in a very unnatural position. The alternative is to move the seat back which then leads to over extending to reach the steering wheel. - Move the seat forward, and the center console arm rest no longer exists. - Without a telescoping steering wheel, arms must be almost straight to reach the wheel. (Note: I am an average size, 5'9" male driver) - The clock is so tiny and so far away from the driver, it can barely be seen. Put on polarized sunglasses and the display screen for the clock, back-up camera, and entertainment system become almost impossible to see in daylight. - Move the tilt steering wheel down, and it covers a good part of the speedometer. - A tiny collection of icons between the tach and speedometer are busy and difficult to decipher at a quick glance. The fact that the outside temperature is part of this tiny display clutters the display and is not convenient for any passengers to view. - The self-dimming mirror is a joke. Street lights "trick" the sensors into thinking it's daylight and the result is blinding glare from the rear view mirror. - The sunvisors are extremely flimsy. They seem to be nothing more that plastic covered card board. And there is no extender on the flimsy visors for when the sun hits at just that annoying "over the shoulder" angle through the side window. - Significant lack of storage space and small cup holders are major inconveniences. - Leather seats and steering wheel are made of a rough texture leather - not supple or smooth. - At highway speeds, road noise is quite loud. - Headlights also seem dim compared to my previous two cars. Added to these horrible ergonomics, my car features a "thump" in the trunk when going over some bumps. The car was "delivered" with 17 miles on the odometer - dirty on the inside and outside, including pine sap blobs that ate through the clear coat. The dealer's fix was to have the finish "wet sanded". After 3 weeks I had a loud thumping in the driver's side rear quarter panel. Had to schedule an appointment with service department. The back-up sensor was banging around inside. They "fixed" it with double-sided tape. Only one "outlet" in the entire car; no usb port. Radio/entertainment center sounds very tinny and cheap. And the horn sounds like something that comes from a child's tricycle. I am SO sorry that I purchased this vehicle.
vireodrove, 07/14/2019
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer
"Great car"
Where do you guys get these values. Says dealer trade in range $ 700 to $ 1700. Doesn't make since at all. I just spent $ 800 on tires alone. Not to mention new brakes, your values are no good, it's sad that you put these fake numbers so that car dealers can rip people off on there trade in value. I would not accept $ 700 trade in value nor would I accept $ 1700 trade in value. That's just insane. No thanks.... This is a great car, have not had any issues with it. The true trade in value is about $ 2600-$ 3500 and should reflect properly on your website. I don't think anyone would sell this car to a car dealer for $ 700 $ 1700 unless it was broken down and had major mechanical issues.
sornerflow, 06/22/2019
2014 Mitsubishi Lancer
"no issues with this car!"
my 2014 mitsubishi lancer se is very reliable I've only replaced filters, oil, and tires . 63500 miles with the factory brakes and battery. Not sure why resale is so low this car has been great and i have owned ford, dodge, chevy, and other gm cars with problem after problem and we are talking new purchase not used. so any way I say this is the best car i have owned and i have bought 11 new ones.

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer DE Specifications

DE Comfort and Convenience

AM/FM stereo radio140-watt AM/FM stereo radio
AntennaRoof-mounted antenna
Driver Vanity MirrorDriver-side sun visor with vanity mirror
Front WipersVariable intermittent windshield wipers
Fuel Door OperationRemote fuel release
Interior Air FilterMicron air filtration
MP3 CapabilityYes
Number of Speakers4 speakers
Passenger Vanity MirrorFront passenger-side sun visor with vanity mirror
Power Door LocksYes
Power Outlet1-12-volt power outlet
Power WindowsPower windows with driver one-touch up/down feature
Rear HeatingRear heater floor ducts
Single CDCD player
Steering Wheel AdjustmentTilt and telescopic steering wheel
Trunk LightYes
Trunk/Hatch OperationRemote trunk release

DE Dimensions

Cargo Capacity376 L
Curb Weight1305 kg
Front Headroom1005 mm
Front Legroom1075 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity59 L
Gross Vehicle Weight1800 kg
Ground Clearance140 mm
Height1481 mm
Length4626 mm
Rear Headroom935 mm
Rear Legroom915 mm
Wheelbase2635 mm
Width1760 mm

DE Exterior Details

Door HandlesBlack door handles
Exterior DecorationGreen laminated windshield
Exterior Folding MirrorsFolding outside mirrors
Exterior Mirror ColourBlack exterior mirrors
GrilleBlack grille with chrome surround
Headlight TypeHalogen headlights
Headlights Auto OffAuto-off headlights
Headlights Daytime Running LightsDaytime running lights
Power Exterior MirrorsPower-adjustable outside mirrors
Rear Window DefrosterYes
Side Turn-signal LampsSide marker lamps

DE Interior Details

Door TrimCloth door trim
Driver Info CenterMulti-information display
Floor ConsoleCentre floor console with storage
Front Seats Front Seat TypeFront bucket seats
Headlight On WarningHeadlights-on warning
Low Fuel WarningYes
Luxury Dashboard TrimMaterial black instrument panel and front door accents
Maintenance Interval ReminderMaintenance reminder
Number of Cup Holders2 front cupholders
Outside Temperature GaugeOutside temperature display
Rear Seat TypeRear bench seat
Seat TrimCloth seats

DE Mechanical

Drive TrainFront-wheel drive
Engine Name2.0L L4 DOHC 16-valve
Stability ControlYes
Traction ControlYes
Transmission5-speed manual transmission

DE Overview

BodySedan
Doors4
Engine2.0L L4 DOHC 16-valve
Fuel Consumption9.6 (Manual City)7.0 (Manual Highway)
Power148 hp @ 6000 rpm
Seats5
Transmission5-speed manual transmission
WarrantiesBumper-to-Bumper100000/km, 60/Months Powertrain160000/km, 120/Months Roadside AssistanceUnlimited/km, 60/Months

DE Safety

Anti-Lock BrakesAnti-lock brakes
Brake AssistBrake assist
Brake Type4-wheel disc
Child Seat AnchorLATCH child seat anchors
Child-proof LocksChild safety rear door locks
Driver AirbagDriver-side front airbag
Electronic brake force distributionElectronic brake force distribution
Front Seat BeltsRegular
Ignition DisableAnti-theft engine immobilizer
Knee AirbagsDriver-side knee airbag
Passenger AirbagPassenger-side front airbag
Rear Seat BeltsCenter 3-point
Roof Side CurtainSide-curtain airbags
Side AirbagSide airbags

DE Suspension and Steering

Front Anti-Roll BarFront stabilizer bar
Front SuspensionFront independent suspension
Front TiresP205/60R16
Power SteeringElectric-assist power rack-and-pinion steering
Rear SuspensionRear independent suspension
Spare TireCompact spare tire
Tire Pressure Monitoring SystemYes
Turning Circle10-meter turning circle diameter
Wheel Type16-inch steel wheels with covers

Critics Reviews

The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer shows its 10 years of age, with a noisy ride and a low-quality interior, which will limit shoppers' interest unless value for money trumps all. Find out why the 2016 ...
Motor Trend reviews the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer where consumers can find detailed information on specs, fuel economy, transmission and safety. Find local 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer prices online.
The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer ranking is based on its score within the 2016 Compact Cars category. Currently the Mitsubishi Lancer has a score of 7.2 out of 10 which is based on our evaluation of 87 pieces of research and data elements using various sources. Critics' Rating: 6.6 Performance: 7.1 ...

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments